I'mBoardDocs
Board OntologyHR

Key Openings

Field-array of priority open roles the board should be aware of and may be able to accelerate — typically C-1 executives, hard-to-fill specialists, and any role open >60 days. Per-item shape: title, department, level, urgency, owner. Rendered via the T2 collapsible-card gallery pattern. Structural, not numeric. Common pitfall: padding the list with every open req — boards add the most value on the 3–8 strategic openings, not on backfilling the next IC. — HR KPI, I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier).

I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier)

No public third-party standard anchors this KPI yet, so I'mBoard authors and maintains the definition — transparently labeled as editorial tier. See the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system and the back-attribution workstream.

Rogue ID: hr.key_openings Type: Text Domain: HR

Definition

Field-array of priority open roles the board should be aware of and may be able to accelerate — typically C-1 executives, hard-to-fill specialists, and any role open >60 days. Per-item shape: title, department, level, urgency, owner. Rendered via the T2 collapsible-card gallery pattern. Structural, not numeric. Common pitfall: padding the list with every open req — boards add the most value on the 3–8 strategic openings, not on backfilling the next IC.

Why it matters

Turns the scalar hr.open_positions count into board-actionable context. Every entry is an opportunity for the board to help with intros, references, or compensation reality-checks. The owner field also surfaces accountability for the search.

How to interpret

Items should name the role, the owner (recruiter or hiring manager), days open, and the ask (intros / references / approval for higher comp band). A role open >90 days without a board narrative or escalation usually signals either insufficient executive attention or unrealistic specifications.

  • hr.open_positions
  • hr.avg_days_to_fill
  • hr.hiring_plan
  • hr.key_hires
  • hr.leader_status
  • hr.talent_challenges

Source

I'mBoard editorial — authored and maintained by I'mBoard, first published 2026-04-01. No third-party standard is cited for this KPI; when one emerges, the definition is back-attributed and promoted to the published tier (a minor version bump). Read the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system, attribution rules, and dispute process.

Stage relevance

Company stagePriority
Series ARecommended
Series BRecommended
Series C+Recommended
PublicRecommended

Suggested for stages: Series A, Series B, Series C+, Public.

Default owning functions

  • HR

Machine-readable

On this page