I'mBoardDocs
Board OntologyFinance

Programme Expense Ratio

Programme services expense as a percentage of total functional expenses for the period — the share of everything spent that went to delivering the mission. The most widely read nonprofit efficiency measure, and the most widely gamed: it is only as honest as the cost-allocation method behind it. — Finance KPI anchored to FASB ASU 2016-14, Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities.

Rogue ID: finance.np_program_expense_ratio Type: Percentage Domain: Finance

Definition

Programme services expense as a percentage of total functional expenses for the period — the share of everything spent that went to delivering the mission. The most widely read nonprofit efficiency measure, and the most widely gamed: it is only as honest as the cost-allocation method behind it.

Formula

program_expense_ratio = program_services_expense ÷ total_functional_expenses × 100.

Why it matters

It is what funders, rating services and prospective donors look up, so a board should know its own figure before someone else quotes it.

How to interpret

Charity watchdogs generally treat 65–75%+ as unremarkable, but the ratio rewards under-investment in administration and fundraising; read it alongside the allocation method and never as a quality score on its own.

  • finance.np_program_services_expense
  • finance.np_total_functional_expenses

Source

FASB ASU 2016-14, Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities · section: ASC 958-720 (functional expense classification) — published 2016-08-01.

Why does this cite FASB ASU 2016-14, Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities? Read the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system, attribution rules, and dispute process.

Stage relevance

Company stagePriority
Pre-SeedCore
SeedCore
Series ACore
Series BCore
Series C+Core
PublicCore

Suggested for stages: Pre-Seed, Seed, Series A, Series B, Series C+, Public.

Default owning functions

  • Finance

Machine-readable

On this page