Terminations
Count of company-initiated employee separations during the period — performance-management exits, layoffs, redundancies, and for-cause terminations. The numerator of `hr.involuntary_turnover_rate` and the inverse of `hr.voluntary_exits` on the attrition page. Common pitfall: bundling layoff events (often one-time, board-known) with normal performance-management churn (steady-state, manager-driven). Best practice is to break out layoffs in `hr.talent_challenges` narrative and reserve this number for the recurring stream. — HR KPI, I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier).
I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier)
No public third-party standard anchors this KPI yet, so I'mBoard authors and maintains the definition — transparently labeled as editorial tier. See the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system and the back-attribution workstream.
Rogue ID: hr.terminations
Type: Number
Domain: HR
Definition
Count of company-initiated employee separations during the period — performance-management exits, layoffs, redundancies, and for-cause terminations. The numerator of hr.involuntary_turnover_rate and the inverse of hr.voluntary_exits on the attrition page. Common pitfall: bundling layoff events (often one-time, board-known) with normal performance-management churn (steady-state, manager-driven). Best practice is to break out layoffs in hr.talent_challenges narrative and reserve this number for the recurring stream.
Formula
Count of company-initiated employee separations within the reporting period — performance terminations, RIFs, role eliminations, and for-cause exits. Excludes voluntary resignations (those are `hr.voluntary_exits`) and contractor-end events.Why it matters
A direct read on performance-management cadence and any organizational restructuring activity. Spikes correlate with strategy pivots, post-fundraise rebalancing, or recovery from over-hiring — each implies different board narratives.
How to interpret
Sustained termination volume above ~1% of headcount per month (excluding announced RIFs) typically signals hiring-quality issues, performance-bar drift, or comp-band misfit (industry folk-wisdom, not citation-grade). One-time RIF events should be reported separately in hr.board_actions with the headcount delta noted.
Related KPIs
hr.involuntary_turnover_ratehr.performance_watch_counthr.headcount_changehr.talent_challengeshr.board_actions
Source
I'mBoard editorial — authored and maintained by I'mBoard, first published 2026-04-01. No third-party standard is cited for this KPI; when one emerges, the definition is back-attributed and promoted to the published tier (a minor version bump). Read the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system, attribution rules, and dispute process.
Stage relevance
| Company stage | Priority |
|---|---|
| Series A | Recommended |
| Series B | Recommended |
| Series C+ | Recommended |
| Public | Recommended |
Suggested for stages: Series A, Series B, Series C+, Public.
Default owning functions
- HR
Machine-readable
- This KPI as JSON:
/api/ontology/hr/terminations.json - All HR KPIs:
/api/ontology/hr.json - Full catalog:
/api/ontology/index.json
Talent Highlights
Free-form narrative on notable hires, promotions, internal moves, and other positive organizational developments the board should be aware of. The "good news" companion to `hr.talent_challenges`. Common pitfall: listing every internal move and burying the genuinely important signals (key executive hires, strategic team-build milestones). Best practice is 3–5 bulleted items per period, each tied to a board-relevant outcome or risk-it-mitigates rather than a generic celebration. — HR KPI, I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier).
Total Contractors
Count of active 1099 contractors, consultants, agencies-of-record, and similar non-employee labor at period end. Tracked separately from `hr.total_headcount` because the cost structure, retention dynamics, and classification risk are different. Common pitfall: under-counting agencies that bill on a project basis without per-head visibility — these often slip out of HR systems and surface only in finance AP detail. A contractor-to-FTE ratio above ~30% sustained typically warrants a classification audit and a deliberate "build vs rent" board conversation. — HR KPI, I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier).