I'mBoardDocs
Board OntologyFundraising

Round Completion %

Progress of the round expressed as committed capital divided by target. Read alongside `round_status` and elapsed-time-in-round to detect stalls. Common pitfall: percentage progress is misleading when measured against a shifting `target_raise` — when management lowers the target mid-round, the percentage jumps without any new commitments arriving. The board should always be told when this is a target revision vs. a real progress event. — Fundraising KPI, I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier).

I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier)

No public third-party standard anchors this KPI yet, so I'mBoard authors and maintains the definition — transparently labeled as editorial tier. See the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system and the back-attribution workstream.

Rogue ID: fundraising.round_completion_pct Type: Percentage (%) Domain: Fundraising

Definition

Progress of the round expressed as committed capital divided by target. Read alongside round_status and elapsed-time-in-round to detect stalls. Common pitfall: percentage progress is misleading when measured against a shifting target_raise — when management lowers the target mid-round, the percentage jumps without any new commitments arriving. The board should always be told when this is a target revision vs. a real progress event.

Formula

round_completion_pct = (committed_amount / target_raise) × 100. When using soft+hard committed, footnote the convention.

Why it matters

Single-number pacing signal — board members glance at it first when scanning a fundraising update. Pairs naturally with elapsed-time-in-round to surface stalls.

How to interpret

Rough pacing checkpoints from collected practitioner essays (NfX, Bessemer founder content): 30% by 4–6 weeks in, 60% by week 8–10, 90%+ by week 12. Sustained pacing below these typically signals a need to widen the investor net or revise the target.

  • fundraising.target_raise
  • fundraising.committed_amount
  • fundraising.round_status
  • fundraising.planned_close_date

Source

I'mBoard editorial — authored and maintained by I'mBoard, first published 2026-04-01. No third-party standard is cited for this KPI; when one emerges, the definition is back-attributed and promoted to the published tier (a minor version bump). Read the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system, attribution rules, and dispute process.

Stage relevance

Company stagePriority
Pre-SeedCore
SeedCore
Series ACore
Series BCore
Series C+Core

Suggested for stages: Pre-Seed, Seed, Series A, Series B, Series C+.

Default owning functions

  • Finance

Machine-readable

On this page