I'mBoardDocs
Board OntologySales

Expansion CAC Ratio

Fully-loaded S&M plus Customer Success expense attributable to expansion divided by expansion CARR generated in the period. Per SMSB, the efficiency read on the upsell / cross-sell / land-and-expand motion. Distinct from the new-logo CAC ratio because the cost base often includes CSMs whose primary metric is retention but whose secondary metric is expansion — boards expect to see that allocation called out. Common pitfall: excluding CS comp entirely understates the true cost of expansion; including all of CS overstates it. The SMSB standard prescribes a documented allocation rule (typically tied to expansion-quota OTE share). — Sales KPI anchored to SaaS Metrics Standards Board.

Rogue ID: sales.expansion_cac_ratio Type: Number Domain: Sales

Definition

Fully-loaded S&M plus Customer Success expense attributable to expansion divided by expansion CARR generated in the period. Per SMSB, the efficiency read on the upsell / cross-sell / land-and-expand motion. Distinct from the new-logo CAC ratio because the cost base often includes CSMs whose primary metric is retention but whose secondary metric is expansion — boards expect to see that allocation called out. Common pitfall: excluding CS comp entirely understates the true cost of expansion; including all of CS overstates it. The SMSB standard prescribes a documented allocation rule (typically tied to expansion-quota OTE share).

Formula

Expansion CAC Ratio = (S&M + CS spend allocated to expansion in period) / (Expansion CARR generated in period). Per SMSB §Expansion CAC Ratio: allocation rule for cross-functional comp (typically split by quota share of OTE) must be documented and consistent.

Why it matters

Validates the financial logic of "expansion is cheaper than acquisition" — when this is healthy, the company should bias growth investment toward post-sale; when it inverts (Expansion CAC ≥ New CAC), the expansion motion is broken and acquisition is the only available lever.

How to interpret

Per SMSB convention, healthy Expansion CAC Ratio is typically 3–5× cheaper than New CAC Ratio — i.e. 0.2–0.5 when New CAC Ratio is ~1.5. Expansion CAC Ratio > 1.0 is a yellow flag (expansion costs as much as it earns); inversion vs New CAC Ratio is a red flag warranting a CS / sales-team org review.

  • sales.blended_cac_ratio
  • sales.new_cac_ratio
  • sales.expansion
  • customers.net_revenue_retention
  • sales.carr

Source

SaaS Metrics Standards Board · section: Expansion CAC Ratio — published 2023-01-01.

Why does this cite SaaS Metrics Standards Board? Read the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system, attribution rules, and dispute process.

Metric definitions reference standards published by the SaaS Metrics Standards Board (saasmetricsboard.com). imboard is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or a member of SMSB.

Stage relevance

Company stagePriority
Series ARecommended
Series BRecommended
Series C+Recommended
PublicRecommended

Suggested for stages: Series A, Series B, Series C+, Public.

Default owning functions

  • Sales
  • Finance

Machine-readable

On this page