I'mBoardDocs
Board OntologyCustomers

NPS Score

Net Promoter Score — % of survey respondents who are promoters (score 9–10) minus % detractors (0–6), passives (7–8) excluded. Per the original NPS methodology (Reichheld, Bain & Company, 2003). The score ranges from −100 to +100. The board reads NPS as one read on product-market fit and word-of-mouth potential, not as a precise customer-loyalty measurement — the methodology is well-known for being sensitive to sample bias, response rate, and survey timing. Common pitfall: comparing NPS across companies without normalizing for industry — B2B SaaS NPS distributions sit much higher than consumer-app NPS, and the absolute number means little without a peer cohort. — Customers KPI anchored to Retently NPS Benchmarks 2025.

Rogue ID: customers.nps_score Type: Number Domain: Customers

Definition

Net Promoter Score — % of survey respondents who are promoters (score 9–10) minus % detractors (0–6), passives (7–8) excluded. Per the original NPS methodology (Reichheld, Bain & Company, 2003). The score ranges from −100 to +100. The board reads NPS as one read on product-market fit and word-of-mouth potential, not as a precise customer-loyalty measurement — the methodology is well-known for being sensitive to sample bias, response rate, and survey timing. Common pitfall: comparing NPS across companies without normalizing for industry — B2B SaaS NPS distributions sit much higher than consumer-app NPS, and the absolute number means little without a peer cohort.

Formula

NPS = (% promoters, score 9–10) − (% detractors, score 0–6). Passives (7–8) are excluded from both. Range: −100 to +100. Per Bain & Company / Reichheld NPS methodology (HBR 2003, "The One Number You Need to Grow").

Why it matters

A coarse-grained directional read on customer affection and word-of-mouth potential. Sustained movement (especially regressions) is the signal the board should focus on, not absolute values — the methodology is too noisy for fine comparisons across companies.

How to interpret

Per Retently NPS Benchmarks 2025, B2B SaaS NPS medians by industry cluster around the +30 to +50 band, with top-quartile +50 to +70. Translate scores to categories: −100 to 0 = needs work, 0–30 = good, 30–70 = great, 70–100 = excellent — these category bands are widely circulated industry folk-wisdom (Bain does not publish strict thresholds). Always pair the score with sample size and response rate; an NPS based on <50 responses or <10% response rate should be flagged as low-confidence.

  • customers.nps_trend
  • customers.retention_insights
  • customers.churn_risks
  • customers.key_initiatives

Source

Retently NPS Benchmarks 2025 · section: NPS Benchmarks — published 2025-01-01.

Why does this cite Retently NPS Benchmarks 2025? Read the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system, attribution rules, and dispute process.

Industry benchmark

A reference distribution sourced from Retently NPS Benchmarks 2025 (2025):

PercentileValue
25th20count
Median36count
75th50count

Higher is better.

Stage relevance

Company stagePriority
Series ACore
Series BCore
Series C+Recommended
PublicRecommended

Suggested for stages: Series A, Series B, Series C+, Public.

Default owning functions

  • Product
  • Sales

Machine-readable

On this page