I'mBoardDocs
Board OntologyProduct

Capacity Allocation

Container handle for the structured 5-category engineering-capacity object — total engineers plus the per-bucket split across innovation, maintenance, tech debt, customer support, and sales support (each a percentage), with an optional innovation target. The bespoke product feed card renders this as the capacity-allocation donut the demo design shows. RICHER than the 3-way `product.capacity_allocation_pct` percentage triple — this carries the headcount + the five operating buckets the donut needs. Common pitfall: the five buckets not summing to 100% because a category (e.g. sales support) was omitted. — Product KPI, I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier).

I'mBoard-authored (editorial tier)

No public third-party standard anchors this KPI yet, so I'mBoard authors and maintains the definition — transparently labeled as editorial tier. See the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system and the back-attribution workstream.

Rogue ID: product.capacity_allocation Type: Text Domain: Product

Definition

Container handle for the structured 5-category engineering-capacity object — total engineers plus the per-bucket split across innovation, maintenance, tech debt, customer support, and sales support (each a percentage), with an optional innovation target. The bespoke product feed card renders this as the capacity-allocation donut the demo design shows. RICHER than the 3-way product.capacity_allocation_pct percentage triple — this carries the headcount + the five operating buckets the donut needs. Common pitfall: the five buckets not summing to 100% because a category (e.g. sales support) was omitted.

Formula

Container — { totalEngineers, innovation, maintenance, techDebt, customerSupport, salesSupport, targetInnovation? }. The five percentage buckets sum to 100%; targetInnovation is the aspirational innovation share, not allocated capacity.

Why it matters

Shows where engineering headcount actually goes across all five operating modes — the gap between innovation and its target is the clearest read on whether the company is investing in the future or absorbed by run-the-business work.

How to interpret

A large gap between innovation and targetInnovation (e.g. 32% vs 50%) means run-the-business work is crowding out new capabilities. Read alongside product.delivery_predictability — falling innovation with falling predictability is a capacity-crisis signal.

  • product.capacity_allocation_pct
  • product.innovation_capacity_pct
  • product.total_engineers
  • product.delivery_predictability

Source

I'mBoard editorial — authored and maintained by I'mBoard, first published 2026-04-01. No third-party standard is cited for this KPI; when one emerges, the definition is back-attributed and promoted to the published tier (a minor version bump). Read the ontology methodology for the published vs editorial tier system, attribution rules, and dispute process.

Stage relevance

Company stagePriority
Series ARecommended
Series BRecommended
Series C+Recommended
PublicRecommended

Suggested for stages: Series A, Series B, Series C+, Public.

Default owning functions

  • Product

Machine-readable

On this page