{
  "version": "1.15.0",
  "releasedAt": "2026-07-17",
  "kpi": {
    "rogueId": "hr.in_jurisdiction_jobs_created",
    "slug": "in_jurisdiction_jobs_created",
    "domain": "hr",
    "defaultLabel": "In-jurisdiction jobs created",
    "description": "Number of jobs created inside the jurisdiction of a public funder DURING the reporting period — a FLOW, not a stock. The figure public funding programmes actually require: SSBCI 2.0 requires annual jobs-created reporting per portfolio company, EU structural funds report \"employment supported\" as a period figure, and US state tax-credit programmes are written in created/retained language. CONVENTION: counts in-jurisdiction positions whose occupant's first day fell within the reporting period and who is still employed in-jurisdiction at period end — counted as-of the reporting date, so a job that existed for a week and ended before period end is not reported as created. Same FTE-equivalent, employees-only, primary-work-location test as `hr.in_jurisdiction_headcount`; contractors are excluded even when in-jurisdiction. NOT DERIVABLE FROM `hr.in_jurisdiction_headcount`: two snapshots of that stock give NET CHANGE, not jobs created. A company that hires 10 in-jurisdiction and loses 10 shows a net delta of 0 while having created 10 jobs — and 10 is the number the funder counts. This is REPORTED BY THE COMPANY (`production: \"primary\"`), never computed from the stock series. Distinct from `hr.new_hires`, which is company-wide and carries no jurisdiction scope, so it cannot be filtered to the funder's geography. Disjoint from `hr.in_jurisdiction_jobs_retained` by construction: a job is created OR retained in a given period, never both.",
    "fieldType": "number",
    "unit": null,
    "maturity": "general",
    "suggestedForStages": [
      "preSeed",
      "seed",
      "seriesA",
      "seriesB",
      "seriesC",
      "public"
    ],
    "defaultOwningFunctions": [
      "HR"
    ],
    "stageRelevance": {
      "preSeed": "core",
      "seed": "core",
      "seriesA": "core",
      "seriesB": "core",
      "seriesC": "core",
      "public": "core"
    },
    "definitionSource": {
      "tier": "editorial",
      "sourceName": "imboard Editorial",
      "sourceUrl": null,
      "sectionRef": null,
      "publicationDate": "2026-04-01",
      "attributionNotice": null,
      "authorityLevel": "imboard-editorial"
    },
    "formula": "Count of in-jurisdiction positions whose occupant's first day fell within the reporting period and who remains employed in-jurisdiction at period end. NOT `hr.in_jurisdiction_headcount[t] - hr.in_jurisdiction_headcount[t-1]` — that is net change, which nets creations against losses and understates (or hides entirely) the jobs a funder counts.",
    "whyItMatters": "Jobs created in the jurisdiction is the number a publicly-funded investor is measured on and reports upward to its own funder — for SSBCI, ultimately to the US Treasury. It is the mandate stated as a rate rather than a level: a portfolio whose in-jurisdiction headcount is flat may still be creating the jobs the programme funded it to create, replacing attrition that would otherwise have shrunk the base. Reading only the stock makes that work invisible.",
    "interpretationGuidance": "Read ALONGSIDE `hr.in_jurisdiction_headcount`, never instead of it: creation with a falling stock means attrition is outrunning hiring (the jobs are real but the base is eroding), while creation with a rising stock is compounding. Never reconstruct this from a change in the stock — the two answer different questions and will legitimately disagree. Because the count is as-of the reporting date, it is not comparable to a \"total hires ever started\" figure from an HRIS, which counts starts that did not survive the period.",
    "relatedKpiIds": [
      "hr.in_jurisdiction_headcount",
      "hr.in_jurisdiction_jobs_retained",
      "hr.new_hires",
      "hr.total_headcount"
    ],
    "metricBasis": {
      "timeBasis": "period_flow",
      "production": "primary"
    }
  }
}
